Published Online First: 25 May 2006.
doi:10.1136/ard.2005.050963
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
2006;65:1551-1557
? 2006 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League
Against Rheumatism
EXTENDED REPORT |
1 Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology
Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
Correspondence to:
A W R van Kuijk
Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical
Center/University of Amsterdam, F4-218, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The
Netherlands; a.w.vankuijk@amc.uva.nl
Accepted 15 May 2006
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|---|
Objective: To investigate extensively the features of cell infiltration and expression of mediators of inflammation and joint destruction in the synovium of patients with PsA compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis matched for disease duration and use of drugs.
Methods: Multiple synovial tissue biopsy specimens were obtained by arthroscopy from an inflamed joint in 19 patients with PsA (eight oligoarthritis, 11 polyarthritis) and 24 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biopsy specimens were analysed by immunohistochemistry to detect T cells, plasma cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, macrophages, proinflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase-1, adhesion molecules and vascular markers. Stained sections were evaluated by digital image analysis.
Results: The synovial infiltrate
of patients with PsA and rheumatoid
arthritis was comparable with regard to numbers of fibroblast-like
synoviocytes and macrophages. T cell numbers were considerably lower
in the synovium of patients with PsA. The number of plasma cells also
tended to be lower in PsA. The expression of tumour necrosis factor
alpha (TNF
), interleukin (IL) 1? IL6 and IL18 was as high in PsA as in
rheumatoid arthritis. The expression of matrix metalloproteinases,
adhesion molecules and vascular markers was comparable for PsA and
rheumatoid arthritis.
Conclusion: These data show
increased proinflammatory cytokine
expression in PsA synovium, comparable to results obtained for
rheumatoid arthritis, and support the notion that, in addition
to TNF
blockade, there may be a rationale for treatments directed at IL1?
IL6 and IL18.
Abbreviations: DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HPF, high-power field; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; MTX, methotrexate; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; vWf, von Willebrand?s factor
The synovial tissue is a primary target of inflammation in many inflammatory arthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). PsA is a chronic, progressive disease in most patients1; a polyarticular onset of PsA is associated with a more destructive course.2 PsA has some typical entities such as the presence of dactylitis, enthesitis and involvement of distal interphalangeal joints. The diagnosis of PsA is in most cases easily made on the basis of the typical clinical signs and symptoms in combination with the presence of psoriatic lesions of skin or nails and often the absence of rheumatoid factor.
The clinical spectrum of PsA is heterogeneous, and the classification into five subgroups by Moll and Wright3 according to the phenotype appears to be partially unreliable in early arthritis cohorts, with almost half of the patients classified as polyarticular in the early stages being reclassified as oligoarticular after 2 years.4 Therefore, new classifying criteria are being developed.5 In addition, there is a need for better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in PsA.
Identification of specific features of the PsA synovial cell infiltrate and mediators of inflammation and destruction may provide insight into the pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic targets. In the past, a few studies have analysed the characteristics of the synovium with PsA compared with that with rheumatoid arthritis,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 with variable results. Several confounding factors may have influenced the results of some of the previous work, the most important probably being differences in the use of antirheumatic drugs and corticosteroids between both groups, which can have a major influence on the features of synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis14?18 and PsA.19?23 Another confounding factor may be the selection of patients. Finally, computer-assisted image analysis of stained sections is more sensitive for detecting differences between groups than the semiquantitative evaluation that has been used in most previous studies. This is especially relevant for the evaluation of the expression of cytokines, adhesion molecules and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) per cell, which cannot be quantified reliably by conventional microscopic evaluation.24
Therefore, we designed a comparative cohort study to investigate the features of cell infiltration, expression of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, MMPs and markers of angiogenesis in the synovium of patients with PsA compared with those with rheumatoid arthritis. Both groups were matched for disease duration and use of drug, and stained sections were analysed using sophisticated computer-assisted image analysis.25
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
Clinical data on disease activity were collected at the time of the biopsy, and consisted of a tender joint count, swollen joint count, patient?s visual analogue scale for disease activity and measurement of severe phase reactants in the blood. All patients gave their informed consent before inclusion.
Arthroscopy and biopsy handling
The
arthroscopy was performed in the most accessible clinically inflamed
large joint (knee, wrist or ankle joint) under local anaesthesia.27
To reduce sampling error, an average of 15 synovial biopsies was
obtained at each arthroscopy. All samples were embedded en bloc in
Tissue Tec OCT (Miles, Elkhart, Indiana,
USA) and subsequently snap frozen. The frozen blocks were stored in
liquid nitrogen until processed. Shortly before staining, 5-?m
sections were cut and mounted on glass slides (Star Frost;
Knittelgl?er, Braunschweig, Germany). The glass
slides were sealed and stored at ?80?C until immunohistochemical
analysis was performed in a single session.
Immunohistochemical staining
Serial sections
were stained with the following mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb):
anti-CD3 (SK7, Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, California, USA),
anti-CD4 (SK3, Becton-Dickinson), anti-CD8 (DK25, Dako, Glostrup,
Denmark), anti-CD38 (Leu-17, Becton-Dickinson), anti-CD55 (mAb67,
Serotec, Oxford, UK), anti-CD68 (EBM11, Dako), anti-CD163 (M0794,
Dako), anti-granzyme B (GrB-7, Monosan, Uden, The Netherlands),
anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1; CD54, BBIG-L1, R&D
Systems Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-vascular cell adhesion
molecule 1 (VCAM-1; CD106, 51-10C9, Becton-Dickinson),
anti-E-selectin (BB1G-E4, R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK),
anti-MMP1 (36665.111 R&D), anti-MMP3 (10D6, R&D),
anti-MMP13 (181-15A12, Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge,
Massachusets, USA), anti-tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase 1
(TIMP-1; 7-6C1, Oncogene Research Products), anti-von Willebrand?s
factor (vWf; F8/86, Dako), and anti-
v? (23C6, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California,
USA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; C-1, Santa
Cruz), anti-basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; clone 6, BD
Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, Kentuky, USA). Staining was
also performed with the following rabbit polyclonal antibodies:
anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF
; IP-300, Genzyme, Cambridge, Massachusets, USA), anti-IL1?
(LP-712, Genzyme), anti-IL6 (LP-716, Genzyme), and anti-IL18 (2D3B6,
MD Biosciences, Z?ich, Switzerland).
Endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited using 0.1% sodium azide and 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline. Staining for cell markers and cytokines was performed as described previously.28 For control sections, the primary antibodies were omitted or irrelevant isotype-matched antibodies were applied. After a primary step of incubation with mAb, the bound antibody was detected according to a three-step immunoperoxidase method. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit antibodies (Dako), naphthol-AS-MX-phosphate, Fast Red Violet LB and levamizole (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA) were used for detection of the rabbit polyclonal antibodies. Staining of MMPs and TIMP-1 was performed using biotinylated tyramide for amplification, as described previously.29 The primary antibodies were incubated for 60 min. Affinity-purified horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Dako) was added for 30 min, followed by subsequent incubation with biotinylated tyramide for 30 min and HRP-conjugated streptavidin for 30 min. HRP activity was detected using hydrogen peroxide as substrate and amino ethylcarbazole (AEC; Sigma) as dye. Slides were counterstained with Mayer?s haematoxylin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and, after washing with distilled water, mounted in Kayser?s glycerol gelatin (Merck).
Microscopic analysis
The coded sections stained for CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD4 and CD8
lymphocytes, CD38 (plasma cells), CD55 (fibroblast-like
synoviocytes), CD68 (macrophages), CD163 (subset of macrophages),
granzyme B (cytotoxic cells), ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin, MMP1, MMP3,
MMP13, TIMP1, vWf,
v?, VEGF, bFGF, TNF
, IL1? IL6 and IL18 were analysed in a random order by
computer-assisted image analysis, as described previously in detail.25
Briefly, three separate representative regions were chosen for
evaluation of each section. Six consecutive high-power fields (HPFs)
from each region were captured and digitised, resulting in a total
of 18 HPFs per section. We have previously shown that this results in
a representative measurement. The HPF images were analysed using the
Qwin analysis system (Leica, Cambridge, UK). Additionally,
vascularity was also separately scored using a semiquantitative
vessel score to evaluate the vWf-stained sections as described
previously in detail.30
Statistics
SPSS 11.5.1 for Windows was used for
statistical analysis. The Mann?Whitney U test was used for comparison
of the various markers in the synovial tissue of rheumatoid arthritis
versus PsA. Results are expressed as mean (standard error of the mean
(SEM)).
| RESULTS |
|---|
As expected, the rheumatoid arthritis group comprised more
women
(17 rheumatoid arthritis, 71%, and seven PsA, 37%) and more
rheumatoid factor-positive patients (18 rheumatoid arthritis,
75%, and one PsA, 5%). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis had
on average a higher swollen joint count (28 swollen joint count
in rheumatoid arthritis: mean (SEM)14.5 (1.6); PsA 7.6 (1.8), p
= 0.005) and CRP (rheumatoid arthritis 41.2 (7.9); PsA 20.5 (3.4)
mg/l, p = 0.019). The fact that on average more joints were affected
in the rheumatoid arthritis cohort may be reflected in the levels of
acute-phase reactants.
Immunohistochemical features
Table 2
and fig 1
show the results of the immunohistochemical
analysis. All biopsy samples were taken from an actively inflamed
joint, shown by pain and swelling, as stated before. The synovial
infiltrate of patients with PsA and rheumatoid arthritis was
comparable with regard to the number of fibroblast-like synoviocytes,
intimal macrophages and sublining macrophages. T cell numbers
were considerably lower in the synovium of patients with PsA.
Consistent with this observation, both CD4 and CD8 T cells tended
to be lower in PsA, but the differences did not reach statistical
significance. It should be noted that CD4 is not only expressed
by CD4+ T cells but may also be expressed by macrophages. The
number of plasma cells also tended to be lower in PsA, although
this difference did not reach statistical significance, possibly
owing to the relatively small number of patients in this type
of study. Interestingly, the expression of the proinflammatory
cytokines TNF
, interleukin (IL)1? IL6 and IL18 was as high in the
synovium in PsA as in rheumatoid arthritis.
|
v? and bFGF. This was confirmed by semiquantitative vessel
analysis on the vWf-stained sections; the scores were also comparable
for rheumatoid arthritis and PsA.
When analysis was performed between patients with oligoarthritis and polyarthritis, no other significant differences or trends were detected (data not shown). Within the PsA group, additional analyses were performed: there were no differences between patients with oligoarthritis and polyarticular arthritis, except for IL1? which was higher in the polyarticular group (p = 0.047); no major differences between MTX users and non-users were found, except for a higher MMP1 expression in the MTX users (p = 0.028).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
, which was equally high in both groups. No other major
differences between PsA and rheumatoid arthritis were found in
synovial cell infiltrate, or in the expression of MMPs, adhesion
molecules or vascularity.
A few previous studies have examined the features of the synovium in PsA with variable results.
Some studies suggested that the synovium in PsA is characterised by less pronounced lining layer in the hyperplasia and fewer monocytes/macrophages in the synovium,6,11 but neither finding could be confirmed in another study that analysed different forms of spondyloarthropathies together.10 One group found fewer T and B cells in the case of spondyloarthropathy synovium,10 but this was not found in the other studies.6,11 The fact that the synovial tissue was collected in different ways and the use of antirheumatic treatment may account for some of the observed differences.6,10,11
Interestingly, recent studies suggested that the presence of major histocompatibility complex?human cartilage gp39 peptide complexes in the synovium could be specific for rheumatoid arthritis12 and that the presence of a p53 mutation was higher in the case of rheumatoid arthritis than in the case of PsA synovium.13 These data suggest that the aetiology may be distinct between rheumatoid arthritis and PsA, although different processes may lead to the activation of common final pathways and similarities in the synovial infiltrate in established disease.
Increased vascularity has been reported in both psoriatic skin lesions and synovial tissue. The dermis of psoriatic skin has an abundance of dilated and tortuous blood vessels.31 This increased dermal vascularity is believed to be mediated by angiogenetic factors.32 Several authors have reported that the synovium in PsA is characterised by an increase in macroscopically tortuous blood vessels, and this is more pronounced?but not exclusive?in PsA than in rheumatoid arthritis.6?8,33 Consistent with the vascular abnormalities, overexpression of VEGF, which is involved in angiogenesis, has been reported in both psoriatic skin34 and synovial tissue in PsA.8,9 However, the increased vascularity in PsA compared with rheumatoid arthritis was not confirmed in all studies.11 In the present study, hypervascularity could be detected in both PsA and rheumatoid arthritis. There were trends toward increased numbers of blood vessels and expression of VEGF in PsA, but the difference from rheumatoid arthritis did not reach statistical significance, possibly because of the relatively small number of patients.
Blood vessels in psoriatic skin and PsA synovium express a
variety
of adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin.6,35
These adhesion molecules are involved in leucocyte adhesion and
penetration through the endothelium. TNF
has been shown to promote the expression of adhesion molecules and
angiogenesis,36 whereas blockade of TNF
resulted in a decrease in the expression of angiogenetic factors and
adhesion molecules in psoriatic skin22 and the synovium in
PsA.22,23,37 In this study, abundant
expression of adhesion molecules was found equally in rheumatoid
arthritis and PsA.
The degradation of cartilage and bone, resulting in structural (radiological) damage in inflammatory arthropathies, is believed to be mediated in part by MMPs. MMPs have been shown to be abundantly present in both rheumatoid arthritis29,38 and PsA.39 It has been suggested that high MMP expression is associated with more destructive disease.39,40 In the present study, there was high expression especially of MMP3, which was comparable for rheumatoid arthritis and PsA. This is in line with recent clinical studies, which showed that joint destruction in PsA is progressive in almost 50% of patients from an early arthritis clinic, showing radiological damage 2 years after first presentation,1 and that the degree of radiological damage in PsA is comparable to that in rheumatoid arthritis.41
Proinflammatory cytokines are important mediators of systemic
and local inflammation, and abundant expression of IL1 and TNF
has been shown in psoriatic skin lesions,42 as
well as in the synovial tissue of both patients with rheumatoid
arthritis and PsA.11,39,43 The success of several TNF
blocking treatments in psoriasis and PsA44?49 and in
rheumatoid arthritis50?53 has confirmed the importance of TNF
in these inflammatory diseases. In this study, there was equally high
expression of TNF
in rheumatoid arthritis and PsA synovium. High expression of IL6,
IL1?SUP> and, to a lesser extent, IL18 in rheumatoid arthritis and PsA
has also been found in the present study. These data support
the view that blockade of not only TNF
but also IL1? IL6 and IL18 might be effective in PsA.
Consistent with previous reports, there were large differences in synovial infiltrate between individual patients within both groups. This may be caused by heterogeneity of what we diagnose clinically as being rheumatoid arthritis or PsA, and may point to the presence of certain disease subsets or pathophysiological differences, as has recently been suggested for rheumatoid arthritis.54
There were no clear-cut differences between patients who used MTX and those who did not, which is in line with a previous cross-sectional study.12 These data show that the lack of clinical response to MTX is reflected by persistent synovial inflammation.
In conclusion, although rheumatoid arthritis and PsA are
clinically
separate diseases, with a different aetiology, the present study
showed mainly similarities in the synovial infiltrate of two
well-matched cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and
PsA. This may be explained by the fact that different pathophysiological
processes may lead to the activation of final common pathways. This
study shows increased proinflammatory cytokine production in PsA
compared with results obtained in rheumatoid arthritis. These data
support the view that, in addition to TNF
blockade, targeted treatments against other proinflammatory cytokines
might be effective in PsA as well.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Competing interests: None.
| REFERENCES |
|---|