BMJ 2007;334:579-581 (17 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39133.559282.BE
Christopher Gale, senior lecturer and consultant psychiatrist1, Oliver Davidson, associate professor and clinical psychologist2
1 Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand, and Mental Health Services, Otago District Health Board, Dunedin, 2 Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand, and Psychology Associates, Dunedin
Correspondence to: C Gale christopher.gale@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Generalised anxiety disorder is a syndrome of ongoing anxiety and worry about many events or thoughts that the patient generally recognises as excessive and inappropriate. However, the nature of "generalised worry" has been hard to describe in a categorical manner. The criteria required for making a diagnosis are evolving: these criteria clearly increase or decrease markedly the threshold for diagnosis.1
|
About 1%-5% of the general population report having generalised anxiety disorder. Many of these people also have other disorders, and those with generalised anxiety disorder report a considerable level of disability. Long term follow-up studies suggest that generalised anxiety disorder is a condition that worsens the prognosis for any other condition, and that people who have only generalised anxiety disorder are likely to develop further conditions. The availability of and evidence for efficacious treatments has increased in the past five years.
We used the Clinical Evidence database2 then searched for community surveys, randomised controlled trials, and systematic reviews?using the term "generalised anxiety disorder"?in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2006.
Most of the recent literature uses DSM-IV criteria for generalised anxiety disorder; the ICD-10 criteria place greater weight on somatic symptoms and explicitly limit comorbidity (box).
|
The table
lists recent community surveys using DSM-IV. These have shown that
1%-5% of the population have reported generalised anxiety disorder in
the past 12 months. The disorder is more common in women, and often
occurs alongside mood disorders, anxiety disorders, somatoform
disorders, and medical conditions.3 4
5 6 7 8
A review found that the rate of
generalised anxiety disorder
was significantly higher (odds ratio 3.3 (95% confidence interval
2.0 to 5.5)) in those who had been invloved in civilian trauma
(such as a dam collapse or toxic chemical spill).9 Reviews have
linked the disorder with bullying (or peer victimisation)10 and an
increase in the number of life events.11 Two reviews of
family studies show an increased risk of the disorder in first degree
relatives of patients.12 13
The incidence of generalised anxiety disorder in men is half that in womenw1 and is lower in older people.w2 A review of 20 observational studies in younger and older adults suggested that autonomic arousal to stressful tasks was lower in older people and that older people became accustomed to stressful tasks more quickly than younger people.w3
Anyone presenting with a mood or anxiety disorder may have generalised anxiety disorder. Most screening questionnaires for the condition ask if the person is a worrier, if they worry overmuch about many things, and then ask if they have somatic symptoms of anxiety. As people with generalised anxiety disorder may develop other mood and anxiety syndromes over time, it is important to screen for these too, particularly depressive disorder.
In clinical trials the most commonly used clinician rating scales are the Hamilton anxiety scale,w4 a 14 item instrument that places an emphasis on somatic symptoms. The most used self report measures are the state trait anxiety inventory,w5 the Beck anxiety inventory,w6 and the Penn state worry questionnairew7; the first and last of these four scales are in the public domain.
Treatment response is generally defined as a 50% reduction in baseline score. Clinical recovery is often defined as a score of less than 7 on the Hamilton anxiety scale or a score of 1 or 2 on the clinical global impression scale.w8
Evidence on long term prognosis is sparse. At 12-year follow-up of adults at an anxiety clinic, 42% of patients had recovered from generalised anxiety disorder, but the disorder was a marker for poor outcome for those patients who had another anxiety disorder.14 In a similar cohort of 68 people with generalised anxiety disorder alone (as defined by DSM-III criteria) at initial assessment and followed over 12 years, two had the disorder alone after 12 years, 28 no longer had a diagnosis, 12 had developed dysthymic disorder, and 10 had developed depression; the rest had been lost to follow up.15
Both cognitive therapy and anxiety management therapy are efficacious, and cognitive behaviour therapy may be more efficacious than anxiety management therapy alone.
Anxiety management therapy is a structured therapy involving education, relaxation training, and exposure but does not include cognitive restructuring; cognitive behaviour therapy adds to this a cognitive restructuring element. Relaxation involves practising techniques that lead to muscular or bodily relaxation. Exposure entails (over a period of time) graded, repeated confrontation (through visualisation, image, or the stimulus) with a stimulus that causes anxiety. Cognitive restructuring involves challenging the dysfunctional thought processes and the underlying assumptions that may be related to the symptoms.
Systematic reviews and subsequent randomised trials found that cognitive behaviour therapy significantly improved anxiety and depression over four to 12 weeks compared with the waiting list control group, anxiety management alone, relaxation alone, or non-directive psychotherapy. 16 17w9 w10 w11 Patients randomised to anxiety management therapy also fare better than waiting list controls, and the efficacy of this treatment may equal that of cognitive therapy.2w12 w13
Two systematic reviews found that antidepressants (imipramine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine) improved symptoms over four to 28 weeks compared with placebo.18 19 Clinical trials have found no significant differences among clinical responses to these antidepressantsw14 or between antidepressants and benzodiazepinesw15 or antidepressants and buspirone.w16 In a systematic review buspirone improved symptoms over four to nine weeks compared with placebo.20 One systematic review found that benzodiazepines reduced symptoms over two to nine weeks compared with placebo.21 A clinical trial found no significant difference in symptoms over three to eight weeks between benzodiazepines, between benzodiazepines and buspirone, hydroxyzine, or abecarnil (not available in the United Kingdom or New Zealand).w17w18 In a systematic review Kava extract significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo (according to scores on the Hamilton anxiety scale).21 There have been some case reports, however, of severe hepatic compromise in patients receiving kava.w19 w20 Evidence from clinical trials indicates that hydroxyzinew21 w20 and pregabalinw23 may be efficacious.
The evidence base for generalised anxiety disorder has grown in recent years. The development of standard methods for conducting and reporting such trials means that the newer trials are of a higher quality and are reasonably comparable.
There are still, however, few trials of clinical effectiveness. More are needed because most patients with generalised anxiety disorder have other mood and anxiety disorders too and are affected for a prolonged period14 and because the nature of comorbid conditions can change over time.15 These trials should compare the following: the efficacious psychotherapies; the efficacious medications; and psychotherapies versus medications. Any such trial design should be sufficiently powered to allow for analysis of comorbid conditions and be designed to run over a longer period of time than previous trials. Furthermore, some treatment options such as benzodiazepines, should be examined by meta-analysis of efficacy before further trials are considered.
Contributors: CG was involved in the development of the search strategy, the resource selection, and the drafting of the paper; he is also the guarantor. OD helped with resource collection, the patient description, and drafting the paper. Kate Thompson helped to develop the search strategy. Keren Skegg and Richard Mullen reviewed the paper before publication.
Competing interests: CG has given talks for Lilly Pharmaceuticals and has attended conferences paid for by Lilly and Jannsen Pharmaceuticals. He has no shares, has not been a consultant to, or an investigator in clinical trials funded by, any pharmaceutical company.
Provenance and peer review: Commissioned and peer reviewed.