Published Online First: 11 October 2005. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.044081
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2006;65:770-774
? 2006 by BMJ
Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism
Determinants of hyperkyphosis in patients
with ankylosing spondylitis
D Vosse1, D van
der Heijde1, R Landew?SUP>1, P
Geusens2, H Mielants3, M
Dougados4 and S van der Linden1
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Division of
Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
2
Biomedical Research Institute, University Hasselt, Campus Diepenbeek, Belgium
3 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
4 Department of Rheumatology, H?ital Cochin, Paris, France
Correspondence to:
Debby Vosse
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University
Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands; dvo{at}sint.azm.nl
Accepted 2 October 2005
 |
ABSTRACT
|
Objective: To
determine clinical and radiographic determinants of hyperkyphosis in
patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Methods: Spinal hyperkyphosis was
assessed by occiput to wall
distance (OWD) in 135 patients participating in the OASIS cohort
and defined as OWD >0. Disease activity was assessed by the
Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI).
Wedging of the vertebrae was calculated as the Ha/Hp ratio.
Structural damage of the spine was assessed by the modified
Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score (mSASSS). Hip involvement
was assessed by the Bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology index
(BASRI) and defined as a score >2. Data were analysed by
multiple regression analysis on van der Waerden-normal OWD values,
with mean Ha/Hp ratio, mSASSS, hip involvement, and BASDAI as
explanatory variables, and age, sex, and disease duration after
diagnosis as covariates.
Results: 61 patients (45.2%) had
an OWD >0 cm. Of these,
81% were male, v 57% in the group with normal OWD (p<0.001).
Forty two patients had wedged thoracic vertebrae, and 27 of these
(44%) had an increased OWD, compared with 15 of 74 with a normal OWD
(20%) (p = 0.005). OWD was correlated with mean wedging of the
thoracic spine (r = ?0.45, p = 0.01), mSASSS (r = 0.56,
p = 0.01), and hip involvement (r = 0.2, p = 0.05).
Multivariate analysis showed that mSASSS (standardised ß (stß) =
0.52; p<0.001), wedging of the thoracic spine (stß = ?0.28; p =
0.01), and BASDAI (stß = 0.15; p = 0.05) were independent
determinants of OWD.
Conclusions: Radiological damage
of the cervical and lumbar
spine, thoracic wedging, and disease activity are determinants
of hyperkyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. These
findings could be important in determining treatment goals in
this disease.
Abbreviations: BASDAI,
Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index; BASFI, Bath ankylosing
spondylitis functional index; BASRI, Bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology
index; mSASSS, modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score; Ha, anterior
height of vertebra; Hp, posterior height of vertebra; ICC, intraclass
correlation coefficient; OASIS, Outcome in Ankylosing Spondylitis International
Study; OWD, occiput to wall distance
Keywords: ankylosing spondylitis;
occiput to wall distance; osteoporosis; radiological damage
Hyperkyphosis of the upper part of the spine is a common
clinical
problem among patients with ankylosing spondylitis.1?3 In our
prevalence cohort of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (Outcome in
Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study (OASIS) cohort) with a
mean disease duration of 9.4 years, 49% of the patients have some
degree of hyperkyphosis, if it is expressed as an occiput to wall
distance (OWD) of more than 0 cm.4 The prominent position
of the head and neck may give rise to functional and psychological
impairment in these patients.5 They may be unable to see
straight ahead and may have difficulties in activities of daily
living; furthermore, severe hyperkyphosis may result in compression
of the abdominal viscera.6
The degree of hyperkyphosis in patients with ankylosing
spondylitis
is related to radiological damage.7 In general, hyperkyphosis
is also associated with vertebral osteoporosis, and it is increasingly
recognised that osteoporosis is a problem in patients with ankylosing
spondylitis.8,9,10,11,12 Vertebral deformities are regarded
as one of the classical hallmarks of vertebral osteoporosis. In a
population based study, the relative risk of vertebral morphometric
deformities in patients with ankylosing spondylitis was 7.6 compared
with the control population.13 Other investigators found a
prevalence of vertebral deformities in 10?17% of the patients with
ankylosing spondylitis seen in the clinic.14?17 In a pilot study we
have shown that thoracic but not lumbar vertebral deformities are
related to an increase of OWD in patients with ankylosing
spondylitis.17 However, it is not known how all potential
contributory factors (such as disease activity, structural damage
visible on radiographs, hip involvement, and vertebral wedging)
interrelate with respect to explaining increased OWD in patients with
ankylosing spondylitis. We therefore investigated the independent
contribution of various factors that may explain
hyperkyphosis in a cross sectional study of patients with ankylosing
spondylitis.
 |
METHODS |
We included 139 patients of the OASIS cohort?an
international
longitudinal, observational study on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis,
with a male to female ratio of 2:1, a mean disease duration of 9.4
years (defined as years since diagnosis), and a mean duration of
complaints of 17.9 years. Consecutive patients in four secondary and
tertiary referral centres, fulfilling the
modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, were
included.18 Patients were followed according to a fixed
protocol.4 Data from the four year assessment were used in the
present analysis, and include the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease
activity index (BASDAI),19 the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional
index (BASFI),20 lateral radiographs of the cervical, thoracic,
and lumbar spine, and radiographs of the pelvis. To assess structural
damage, the modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score
(mSASSS) was used.21 This method scores the anterior site of
the lumbar spine (lower border T12 to upper border S1) and cervical
spine (lower border C2 to upper border T1) on a lateral view. The
anterior corners of each vertebra are examined and scored 1 for an
erosion, sclerosis, or squaring, 2 for a syndesmophyte, and 3 for
total bony bridging, giving a maximum possible score of 72. The
mSASSS was applied by one observer (AW) (fig 1
). In a previous experiment we determined that
intraobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.98) and
interobserver (ICC = 0.99) reliability on mSASSS status scores of
this observer were excellent.22 Radiographic hip
involvement determined according to the Bath ankylosing spondylitis
radiology index (BASRI)-hip23 was as follows: 0, no involvement; 1,
(possible) focal joint space narrowing; 2, definite narrowing leaving
a circumferential joint space >2 mm; 3, narrowing with
circumferential joint space
2 mm or bone on bone apposition of <1 cm; 4, bone deformity
or bone on bone apposition
1 cm. Grades 1 and 2 increase by one grade if two of the
following bony changes were present: erosions, osteophytes,
protrusion. Scores are applied to both hips. For the purpose of this
article, hip involvement was defined as a BASRI-hip >2. Anterior (Ha)
and posterior (Hp) height of the vertebrae was measured on lateral
radiographs of the thoracic (T4?12) and lumbar spine (L1?5) in
millimetres by one observer (DV) (fig 2
) Imaging of the first three thoracic vertebrae is
mostly inadequate so we omitted them in the analyses. Wedging of a
vertebra was calculated as the Ha/Hp ratio. This was defined as mild
if the ratio was >0.75 but
0.80, moderate if the ratio was >0.60 but
0.75, and severe if the ratio was
0.60.24 We calculated the mean wedge (mean Ha/Hp ratio)
of all thoracic and lumbar vertebrae per patient, as well as
for the lumbar and thoracic spine separately.

|
Figure 1
Assessment of modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score
(mSASSS).
| |

|
Figure 2
Measurement of vertebral heights.
| |
To assess interobserver reliability of measuring anterior
and posterior height two readers measured 70 vertebrae in 10 patients
with ankylosing spondylitis. These vertebrae were chosen by an
independent observer who tried to include the entire spectrum of
deformities. The smallest detectable difference, calculated according
to the limits of agreement method by Bland and Altman, was 0.14 for
the Ha/Hp ratio. The ICC for mean vertebral wedging was 0.93 (95%
confidence interval (CI), 0.85 to 0.96) for absolute heights and 0.84
(0.74 to 0.96) for Ha/Hp ratios.
To quantify hyperkyphosis the distance between occiput and
wall
(OWD) was assessed with the patient standing with the heels and
back against the wall, with hips and knees as straight as possible.
The chin was held at the usual carrying level and the patient exerted
maximum effort to touch the head against the wall. The distance
between the wall and the occiput was measured in centimetres to one
decimal place. The better of two tries was recorded.25,26
Patients were grouped as having
a normal OWD ( = 0 cm) or an increased OWD (>0 cm).
Statistical analysis
We used
2 tests to test
differences in proportions. Spearman?s correlation coefficients were
calculated to investigate univariate associations between OWD and
mean wedging, mSASSS, and BASDAI. Linear regression analysis was
undertaken to investigate the independent contribution of BASDAI,
mean wedging, hip involvement, and mSASSS to explain variation in the
dependent variable OWD. Covariates in the analysis were age, disease
duration, and sex. Variables that were not normally distributed were
first normalised by the Van der Waerden technique.
 |
RESULTS |
Of the 139 patients, four could not be included because of
incomplete data. Table 1
presents some baseline characteristics of the
patients. Of the 135 patients with complete data, 50 of the 90
male patients (56%) and 11 of the 45 female patients (24%) had an OWD
>0 cm (p = 0.001). Compared with patients with a normal OWD, patients
with an increased OWD were older, had a longer mean disease duration,
and were more often of male sex. Disease activity (BASDAI) was
similar in the two groups with a higher level of physical limitation
(BASFI) and radiographic damage of the spine (mSASSS). In our cohort,
12 patients (9%) had severe radiological hip involvement; eight of
these had an OWD of >0 cm.
Overall, 42 patients had 89 vertebral wedgings,
defined as a Ha/Hp ratio
0.80. When comparing fracture rates in patients with normal
OWD (n = 74) and increased OWD (n = 61), 15 patients in the normal
OWD group (20%) had vertebral fractures compared with 27 (44%) with
OWD >0 cm. Of these 89 fractures, 59 (66%) were mild, 29 (33%)
moderate, and one (1%) severe. All fractures were found in the
thoracic spine except for four (three moderate, one mild) in the
first lumbar vertebra and one mild fracture in the fourth lumbar
vertebra (table 2
). When comparing the number of fractures with OWD
we found significant correlations, both when analysing all fractures
and when analysing fracture groups (no, 1, or >1 fracture and yes/no
fractures) versus OWD (p = 0.002, p = 0.01, p = 0.003, respectively).
Spearman?s correlation coefficients were calculated to investigate
univariate associations between OWD and mean wedging in the thoracic
and lumbar spine, mSASSS, hip involvement, and BASDAI. OWD showed
significant correlations with all factors except mean lumbar wedging
and BASDAI (table 3
). To explore the independent contribution of
different variables in explaining the variation in OWD (as a
continuous measure), linear regression analysis was undertaken.
Because age, sex, and disease duration may be associated with OWD
spuriously, these variables were included as covariates. Table 4
shows the main results of this analysis. Variation
in OWD was primarily explained by mSASSS. There was, however, an
independent contribution of both mean thoracic wedging and cross
sectional assessed BASDAI. In this analysis severe hip involvement
did not independently contribute to explaining variation in OWD,
although a positive trend could be recognised.
OWD was merely associated with wedging of
the thoracic part of the vertebral column. However, the mSASSS does
not take the thoracic spine into account, only the cervical and
lumbar spine. We analysed the contribution of the mSASSS of the
cervical spine and the lumbar spine separately in explaining OWD by
regression models, including the same variables as in the main model.
The contribution of both site specific mSASSSs in explaining
variation in OWD was approximately similar (stß = 0.62 for the
cervical mSASSS and 0.57 for the lumbar mSASSS).This is not
unexpected as the cervical and lumbar mSASSS values were highly
correlated (r = 0.64).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the entire OASIS cohort, spinal hyperkyphosis (OWD >0)
occurs in half the patients.4 In our study we found a clear
correlation between radiological damage assessed on the anterior
site of the cervical and lumbar spine (mSASSS) and hyperkyphosis.
Furthermore, mean thoracic wedging was significantly and independently
contributory to explaining OWD, while lumbar wedging deformities did
not contribute to OWD. Wedging was assessed in the thoracic spine as
well as in the other parts, but mSASSS does not score thoracic spine.
The reason is that radiographic changes in this particular area of
the spine are difficult to score and reproducibility is not good.
Braun et al published data on magnetic resonance imaging
changes in the thoracic spine and they found that the thoracic spine
was prominently involved in comparison with the cervical and lumbar
spine.27 Missing the thoracic spine scores could have been
crucial if we had not found a correlation between mSASSS and OWD, as
in such a scenario preferential thoracic spine damage could still be
an explanation. However, we found a correlation between radiological
changes and OWD, even without including thoracic spine data, and we
believe that if we had included the thoracic spine, these data would
only have strengthened our findings.
In a multivariate analysis, in addition to mSASSS and mean
thoracic
wedging, disease activity (BASDAI) independently, although marginally,
contributed to spinal hyperkyphosis. Considering the hip involvement
in ankylosing spondylitis as a possible factor leading to limitation
of movement, one can assume the influence of fixed flexion of the
hips on the OWD. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between
hip involvement and hyperkyphosis. We analysed this by comparing OWD
in patients with severe hip involvement (BASRI >2) versus no or mild
hip involvement (BASRI
2). This analysis showed a trend, but did not reach
statistical significance in both the univariate and multivariate
analyses, possibly due to the low prevalence of hip involvement. It
should be stressed that the variables that we have investigated here
only in part explain hyperkyphosis. Other potentially contributory
factors include inflammation of ligaments, muscles and entheses. And
in a previous article we described the role of disc deformities in
hyperkyphosis.17 In this study we did not analyse these soft
tissues, as we focused on vertebral wedging and radiographic damage.
A shortcoming of our study is the cross sectional design. It
would be preferable to have a prospective follow up of patients with
ankylosing spondylitis in an early phase of their disease and to
observe the development of the spine deformity. On the other hand,
others could not find a relation between radiological damage and
disease duration, age at diagnosis, or acute phase response in such
prospective studies.7 In previous analyses Boonen et al28
concluded that there was no change in self reported
health status over a period of four years. In a long term follow
up study of the OASIS cohort, in which patients were followed
every two months during the first two years and every year thereafter,
mean BASDAI did not change (stß = 0.007 (95% CI, ?0.013 to 0.027)),
which is why we believe a cross sectional approach is justified.
Possible confounders of the relation between wedging and OWD
are age and sex, as OWD may increase with age, and as ankylosing
spondylitis is a predominantly male disease with a more serious
course in male than in female patients.1 However, we did not
find a relation between age, sex, and OWD, either univariate
or multivariate.
In ankylosing spondylitis the burden of illness is a result
of longstanding inflammation and its consequences. Further,
cumulative inflammation results in radiological damage reflected in
mSASSS scores. In our study we found an independent significant
relation between these factors and hyperkyphosis.
In analogy with periarticular bone loss in rheumatoid
arthritis,
we hypothesise that vertebral wedging is the result of periarticular
bone loss in the spine.29 Inflammatory processes are found to
be associated with increased bone loss and bone turnover.9,30 This
results in reduced bone mineral density.
Osteoporosis is shown to be associated with inflammatory
rheumatic
diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis31,32 and ankylosing
spondylitis.11 Vertebral deformities are considered to be the main
feature of osteoporosis. Our study confirmed an independent
significant relation between wedging of (thoracic) vertebrae and
hyperkyphosis.
Conclusions
We found three
independent significant contributory factors to hyperkyphosis:
structural damage of the spine, wedging of thoracic vertebrae, and
cross sectional disease activity. In addition we found a
significantly higher BASFI in patients with an OWD of >0 cm.
Therefore, in order to prevent or limit functional decline, future
studies on new treatments in ankylosing spondylitis should include
prevention, if possible, of the development of structural damage as
well as prevention of the development of vertebral osteoporosis and
its effect on hyperkyphosis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
We thank T Schoonbrood MD
for her assistance in scoring the vertebral radiographs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Published Online First 11 October 2005
 |
REFERENCES |
- Carette S , Graham D,
Little H, Rubenstein J, Rosen P. The natural disease course of ankylosing
spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum
1983;26:186?90.[Medline]
- Wilkinson M ,
Bywaters EGL. Clinical features and course of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann
Rheum Dis 1958;17:209?16.[Medline]
- Spencer DG, Park WM,
Dick HM, Papazoglou SN, Buchanan WW. Radiological manifestations in 200
patients with ankylosing spondylitis: correlation with clinical features and
HLA-B27. J Rheumatol
1979;6:305?15.[Medline]
- Spoorenberg A , van
der Heijde D, de Klerk E, Dougados M, deVlam K, Mielants H, et al. A
comparative study of the usefulness of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis
Functional Index and the Dougados Functional Index in the assessment of
ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol
1999;26:961?5.[Medline]
- McMaster MJ. Osteotomy
of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br
1997;79:197?203.[CrossRef]
- Kim KT, Suk KS, Cho
YM, Hong GP, Park BJ. Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction
osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine
2002;27:612?18.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Averns HL, Oxtoby J,
Taylor HG, Jones PW, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT. Radiological outcome in
ankylosing spondylitis: use of the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score
(SASSS). Br J Rheumatol
1996;35:373?6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bronson WD, Walker SE,
Hillman LS, Keisler D, Hoyt T, Allen SH. Bone mineral density and
biochemical markers of bone metabolism in ankylosing spondylitis. J
Rheumatol 1998;25:929?35.[Medline]
- Lee YS, Schlotzhauer
T, Ott SM, van Vollenhoven RF, Hunter J, Marcus R, et al. Skeletal
status of men with early and late ankylosing spondylitis. Am J Med
1997;103:233?41.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Devogelaer JP,
Maldague B, Malghem J, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C. Appendicular and vertebral
bone mass in ankylosing spondylitis. A comparison of plain radiographs with
single- and dual-photon absorptiometry and with quantitative computed
tomography. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1062?7.[Medline]
- Will R , Palmer R,
Bhalla AK, Ring EFJ, Calin A. Osteoporosis in early ankylosing spondylitis:
a primary pathologic event?
Lancet. 1989 Dec 23/30 2:1483?5.
- Maghraoui A ,
Borderie D, Cherruau B, Eduoard R, Dougados M, Roux C. Osteoporosis, body
composition and bone turnover in Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol
1999;26:2205?9.[Medline]
- Cooper C , Carbone
L, Michet CJ, Atkinson EJ, O?Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Fracture risk in patients
with ankylosing spondylitis: a population based study. J Rheumatol
1994;21:1877?82.[Medline]
- Ralston SH, Urquhart
GDK, Brzeski M, Sturrock RD. Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures
due to osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis. BMJ 1990;300:563?5.[Medline]
- Donnelly S , Doyle
DV, Denton A, Rolfe I, McCloskey EV, Spector TD. Bone mineral density and
vertebral compression fracture rates in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum
Dis 1994;53:117?21.[Abstract]
- Mitra D , Elvins DM,
Speden DJ, Collins AJ. The prevalence of vertebral fractures in mild
ankylosing spondylitis and their relationship to bone mineral density.
Rheumatology 2000;39:85?9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Geusens P , Vosse D,
van der Heijde DM, Vanhoof J, van Tubergen A, Raus J, et al. High
prevalence of thoracic vertebral deformities and discal wedging in
ankylosing spondylitis patients with hyperkyphosis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1856?61.[Medline]
- van der Linden SM,
Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing
spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria.
Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361?8.[Medline]
- Calin A , Nakache
JP, Gueguen A, Zeidler H, Mielants H, Dougados M. Defining disease activity
in ankylosing spondylitis: is a combination of variables (Bath ankylosing
spondylitis disease activity index) an appropriate instrument? J
Rheumatol 1994;38:878?82.
- Calin A , Garrett S,
Whitelock H, Kennnedy G, O?Hea J, Mallorie P, et al. A new approach
to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of
the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2281?5.[Medline]
- Creemers MCW,
Franssen MJAM, van?t Hof MA, Gribnau FWJ, van de Putte LBA, van Riel PLCM.
Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiological
scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis
2005;64:127?9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wanders AJB,
Landew?RBM, Spoorenberg A, Dougados M, van der Linden S, Mielants H, et
al. What is the most appropriate radiological scoring method for
ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the
OMERACT filter. Arthritis Rheum
2004;50:2622?32.[CrossRef][Medline]
- MacKay K , Mack C,
Brophy S, Calin A. The Bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology index (BASRI).
A new, validated approach to disease assessment. Arthritis Rheum
1998;41:2263?70.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Genant HK, Wu CY,
Kuijk van C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi
quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137?48.[Medline]
- Bellamy N .
Musculoskeletal clinical metrology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
publishers, 1993.
- Heuft-Dorenbosch L ,
Vosse D, Landewe R, Spoorenberg A, Dougados M, Mielants H, et al.
Measurement of spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of
occiput-to-wall and tragus-to-wall distance. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1779?84.[Medline]
- Braun J , Baraliakos
X, Golder W, Hermann KG, Listing J, Brandt J, et al. Analysing
chronic spinal changes in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic comparison of
conventional x rays with magnetic resonance imaging using established and
new scoring systems. Ann Rheum Dis
2004;63:1046?55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Boonen A , van der
Heijde D, Landew?R, Mielants H, Dougados M, van der Linden S. Health status
in patients with ankylosing spondylitis shows no relevant change over a
period of 4 years. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22: 682 P4, 12.
- Haugeberg G , Strand
A, Kvien TK, Kirwan JR. Reduced loss of hand bone density with prednisolone
in early rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a randomized placebo-controlled
trial. Arch Intern Med
2005;165:1293?97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Toussirot E ,
Ricard-Blum S, Dumoulin G, Cedoz JP, Wendling D. Relationship between
urinary pyridinium cross-links, disease activity and disease subsets of
ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology
1999;38:21?37.[Free Full Text]
- Deodhar AA, Woolf AD.
Bone mass measurement and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: a review.
Br J Rheumatol
1996;35:309?22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Laan RFJM, Buijs
WCAM, Verbeek AL, Draad MP, Corstens FH, van de Putte LB, et al. Bone
mineral density in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis:
influence of disease activity and functional capacity. Ann Rheum Dis
1993;52:21?6.[Abstract]