Published Online First: 28 March 2006.
doi:10.1136/ard.2005.035295
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
2006;65:1545-1550
? 2006 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League
Against Rheumatism
REVIEW |
1 Department of Internal Medicine, CHU Rouen, Rouen,
France
2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Immunology,
Academish Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3
Department of Internal Medicine A, CHU H?el Dieu, Nantes, France
Correspondence to:
C Belizna
Department of Internal Medicine A, CHU Rouen, 147 Avenue du Mar?hal
Juin, 76000 Rouen, France; cristina.belizna@wanadoo.fr
Accepted 17 March 2006
ABSTRACT
Antiendothelial cell
antibodies (AECA) are a heterogeneous family of antibodies reacting
with endothelial cell antigens. These antibodies are found in various
diseases and recognise several antigen determinants. Different
pathophysiological effects have been observed in in vitro
experiments, which include direct or indirect cytotoxicity and
endothelial cell apoptosis. Furthermore, some AECA activate
endothelial cells, resulting in increased leucocyte adhesiveness,
activation of coagulation and vascular thrombosis. In animal models,
it has been shown that AECA could promote vascular damage. Neither
the endothelial cell antigens nor their precise role in the
pathogenecity of different diseases in which AECA are found is well
characterised. Nowadays, it is not known whether AECA are an
epiphenomenon accompanying vascular injury or whether they are
pathogenic. It is controversial whether fluctuations in AECA titres
are associated with disease activity during follow-up studies. This
review summarises the present knowledge about AECA, AECA antigens and
their potential role in the pathogenecity of vasculitis and
connective tissue diseases.
Abbreviations: ADCC, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity; AECA, antiendothelial cell antibodies; AHA, antiheparin antibodies; APL, antiphospholipid; ?-GPI, ?-glycoprotein I; CDC, complement-dependent cytotoxicity; FCS, fetal calf serum; Hsp, heat-shock protein; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis
The vascular endothelium has a pivotal position.1 Antiendothelial antibodies (AECA) recognise a wide variety of antigens.2 Their presence has been reported in connective tissue diseases, vasculitides and other inflammatory diseases (reviewed by Belizna et al3). The target antigens in these diseases are usually different and AECA possibly have several effects in vivo, explaining their complexity and heterogeneity.4 Although first described more than three decades ago,5 their pathophysiological role is still not completely understood, owing to the lack of precise characterisation of putative targets. Moreover, it is not established at what moment during vascular damage these antibodies are generated and whether they cause vascular dysfunction in vivo. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence for the clinical importance and possible pathogenic role of AECA. They may interfere and control several endothelial cell functions, and therefore be a driving mechanism for vascular injury. This review discusses their role. Do AECA have a pathogenic role? Are they only "on the backstage" on the vasculitis theatre? Are they a marker of disease activity? This review summarises the present knowledge in this field, and discusses the progress made in the debate about their potential pathogenic role.
AECA DETECTION
AECA are usually
detected by ELISA using cultured human umbilical vein endothelial
cells (HUVEC) as substrate.3,6,7 Generally, confluent
endothelial cell monolayers are fixed before testing to avoid
non-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G binding and loss of cells.
Fixation, however, induces permeabilisation of endothelial cell
membranes and part of the AECA reactivity could be due to reaction
with intracellular compounds. To avoid these artefacts, several
groups use ELISAs with unfixed endothelial cells.3 Moreover,
other techniques are used, such as immunofluorescence, radioimmunoassays,
fluorescence-activated cell sorting, immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation,
complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent
cytotoxicity (ADCC).3 Furthermore, endothelial cells other than
HUVEC are sometimes used, such as cell membrane extracts, cells from
renal or medullar microvessels, and cell lines.8,9 Each
method and each substrate has a certain degree of specificity
and sensitivity, and its own advantages and disadvantages. One
perturbing element when comparing these tests is the variation
between results, probably due to the modalities of antigenic
preparations.10 Erroneous reporting of negative AECA may be
owing to the lack of expression of certain target antigens on
a specific substrate. Renaudineau et al2 suggested the
use of several endothelial cell substrates simultaneously to
eliminate false-negative results.2
Heterophilic antibodies could sometimes be detected. Therefore, false-positive AECA could be reported owing to endogenous antibodies reacting with fetal calf serum (FCS) proteins from culture medium coated on ELISA plates. These results could be avoided by antibody absorption in FCS-containing dilution buffer or by washing cells free of FCS before plating.11
Until now, to our knowledge, no standardised test or substrate exists for AECA detection, but concentrated efforts are currently being made.
PATHOGENIC EFFECTS
Direct cytotoxicity
of AECA was reported only in few diseases. AECA could exert their
pathogenic role either via CDC in patients with Kawasaki disease, or
via ADCC mechanisms in those with Wegener granulomatosis or with
microscopic polyangeitis.3
However, these data have not been confirmed.12 In Takayasu?s arteritis, some authors suggest that AECA are responsible for CDC.13
In 12 patients with Takayasu?s arteritis, no sera showed
ADCC at any of the effector:target ratios tested.13,14 Furthermore,
this ratio was too high, suggesting a minor contribution of this
mechanism during vascular injury in vivo. Rather than exerting a
direct cytotoxicity, AECA could be pathogenic in vasculitis by
activating endothelial cells, triggering the leucocyte adhesion to
endothelial surfaces and cytokine production. However, recent
experimental data suggest other AECA pathogenic mechanisms (fig 1
).
Activation of endothelial cells
Incubation with AECA from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE) is followed by changes in expression of endothelial adhesion
molecules such as E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule 1,
and changes in the profile of cytokine secretion, with the production
of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)1 and tumour necrosis
factor TNF
). This endothelial cell activation is dose dependent, as
shown by in vitro incubation with serial AECA concentrations.15
Additional information comes from data
showing the induction of a pro-inflammatory endothelial phenotype
when endothelial cells are incubated with human monoclonal AECA
from a patient with SLE.16 Endothelial cell activation is
partially regulated by autocrine or paracrine actions of cytokines
(IL 1).17 The signal transduction pathway in the
expression of adhesion molecules induced by AECA seems to be via the
mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, but not exclusively.18
Therefore, endothelial cell activation seems to be mediated through
nuclear factor
B pathway and c-Jun N-terminal kinase?mitogen-activated
protein kinases in response to TNF
.19,20 Interestingly, endothelial cell activation
mediated by anti-?-glycoprotein I (?-GPI) antibody can be inhibited
by statins. The capacity of these drugs to down regulate the
expression of adhesion molecules suggests their possible use in
various pathologies in which endothelial cell activation seems
pathogenic.21
Induction of coagulation
Under physiological
conditions, endothelial cells possess anticoagulant properties. Some
AECA are responsible for the synthesis of tissue factor, the
physiological initiator of coagulation. It has been found that after
exposure to sera from patients with SLE, HUVEC produced high amounts
of tissue factor.22
Moreover, when monoclonal AECA and anti-?-GPI antibodies derived from patients with Takayasu?s arteritis and antiphospholipid syndrome were incubated with endothelial cells, they induced tissue factor production. Furthermore, tissue factor activity, tissue factor antigen and tissue factor mRNA were dose dependent on AECA titres.23 Tissue factor activity was also time dependent; it was elicited by F(ab)2 fragments and completely disappeared when incubated with anti-tissue factor antibodies.
?-GPI can adhere to endothelial cells. The autoantibody
binding activates a signalling pathway responsible for the translocation
of nuclear factor
B from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and the activation of
genes for up regulation of the adhesion molecule, pro-inflammatory
cytokine and tissue factor.
Furthermore, the antiphospholipid antibodies interfere with the binding of annexin V, synthesis of endothelin I, induction of apoptosis and the protein containment/surveillance system.24 Some studies have shown an association between antiphospholipid antibodies and low levels of free protein S,25 and ?-GPI interferes with the binding of protein S to its plasma inhibitor.26
Altogether, these effects contribute to a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant endothelial phenotype. Since the description of antiheparin antibodies (AHA), much progress has been made to show how AECA induce a change in coagulant properties of endothelial cells. AHA have been reported in autoimmune diseases and their action has been reproduced in animal models. In endothelial cells, heparin sulphate represents the major glycosaminoglycan. AHA exert CDC on endothelial cells and form immune complexes with heparin. AECA binding to endothelial cells is followed by the cleavage and release of heparan sulphate on the endothelial cell surface, inducing pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant consequences or apoptosis. This effect is specific for AECA, as elution studies failed to show inhibition with cardiolipin, anti-DNA, hyaluronate or chondroitine sulphate.2 AHA are found in patients with SLE and correlate with renal and neurological disease. Furthermore, immunisation with glycosaminoglycan is followed by a systemic sclerosis (SSc)-like disease.27 As AHA correlate with AECA activity, these antibodies could be considered to be part of the AECA repertoire.28 Furthermore, it has been shown that autoantibodies to heparan sulphate may contribute to vascular injury via CDC mechanisms in MRL/lpr/lpr mice;29 yet, the target antigens for AECA and AHA are incompletely characterised. Their molecular weight varies between 20 and 200 kDa. Recently, the use of a monoclonal AECA to inhibit heparin binding to endothelial cells enabled the identification of a putative endothelial heparin receptor (a 45 000-M(r) heparin-binding polypeptide).30
Apoptosis
Rather than exerting a direct cytotoxic
effect, some AECA may induce endothelial cell apoptosis. Therefore,
some authors reported apoptosis after incubation of human endothelial
cells with AECA from patients with SSc. This phenomenon was inhibited
by an anti-Fas ligand antibody, suggesting that apoptosis in SSc is
mediated through CD95 (Fas).31
Adversely, some other authors report Fas-independent apoptosis.32
If in vitro studies have suggested the AECA?s role in mediating endothelial cell apoptosis, recent data led to suppose the same effects in vivo. Therefore, the injection of AECA-positive serum samples in normal chicken embryos from University of California at Davis line 200 chickens spontaneously developing a scleroderma-like disease was followed by an increased endothelial cell apoptosis.33 AECA are often associated with antibodies to anionic phospholipids such as the phosphatidylserine. AECA and antiphospholipid (APL) antibodies seem to be different species of antibodies, although they may cross react.8 Anticardiolipin antibodies may behave as AECA, as absorption on to endothelial cells resulted not only in inhibition of AECA activity but also considerably reduced binding of anticardiolipin antibodies. In contrast, AECA binding could not be inhibited by incubation with cardiolipin.34 However, AECA activity is partially related to APL. Hence, the incubation of endothelial cells with AECA is followed by the translocation of phosphatidylserine with the exposure of phosphatidylserine on the outer face of the endothelial cell membrane, followed by apoptosis.
APL antibodies recognise and activate endothelial cells.8,35 They do not recognise anionic phospholipids, but plasma proteins bound to anionic surfaces such as ?-GPI and prothrombin. Therefore, APL antibodies react with endothelial cells, mainly by reacting with ?-GPI on the cell surface. ?-GPI can adhere to endothelial cells via the annexin II receptor and negatively charged structures (heparin-like molecules) bound by the phospholipid-binding site of the molecule. Furthermore, a subset of APL antibodies recognises annexin V and induces endothelial cell apoptosis.36 Adhesion of ?-GPI to endothelial cells offers suitable epitopes for circulating APL antibodies that can induce endothelial cell activation.37?39 Moreover, a new antigen in patients with SLE?namely, heat-shock protein 60 (Hsp60)?is the target for anti-Hsp60 antibodies that bind to endothelial cells and induce phosphatidylserine exposure, followed by apoptosis, thus providing a target for anti-phosphatidylserine.40
The incubation of human endothelial cells with APLs is followed by production of tissue factors and up regulation of adhesion molecules. Cell activation is associated with translocation of nuclear factor kappa B and with a signalling cascade similar to that triggered by the toll-like receptors.41
This activation seems to be mediated by ?-GPI and incriminated in the adhesion of the leucocytes to the vessel wall.
However, ex vivo analysis of several parameters of endothelial cell dysfunction suggests that APLs alone could not be responsible for endothelial cell perturbation, and support a two-hit pathogenic hypothesis.42
ANTIGEN CHARACTERISATION
AECA are
generally not specific for endothelial cells.3 Endothelial
cell-specific antigens for AECA are found only in a few cases, such
as in patients with Kawasaki disease.14 Antigens recognised
by AECA include constitutively expressed or cytokine-induced cryptic
antigens, as well as adherent molecules.3 As expected,
various antigens are found when several types of substrates are used.
Although not a major antigen determinant for AECA, human leucocyte
antigen class I determinants are also endothelial cell antigens. A
25% reduction in AECA binding was reported after serum samples from
patients with systemic vasculitides were incubated with a crude
extract of extracellular matrix components.43
Extracellular matrix components may also be target antigens for AECA,
such as collagen types II, IV and VII, vimentin or laminin.3,43
Antilaminin antibodies were reported in patients with SSc and in
those with primary Raynaud?s phenomenon, whereas antivimentin
antibodies were found in patients with SLE.3 Human
leucocyte antigen class II determinants, present only on activated
endothelial cells, could also be target antigens for AECA. In
patients with Kawasaki disease, however, they are not major antigenic
determinants.3,14
Proteinase 3 could represent another potential cryptic target antigen. Mayet and Meyer zum Buschenfelde44 have shown that ANCA recognise proteinase 3 translocated into the endothelial cell membrane; but this finding could not be reproduced by others.45 Several molecules could bind to endothelial cells and become so-called planted target antigens for AECA via presumed charge-mediated mechanisms, a DNA?histone bridge or a specific receptor. Examples are myeloperoxidase, DNA or ?-GPI,3 which might adhere to endothelial cells during incubation of endothelial cells with sera of patients. Subsequently, positive AECA are reported, but in reality anti-myeloperoxidase, anti-DNA or anti-?-GPI antibodies are detected.
Moreover, ?-GPI could also be produced by the endothelium itself, or it could be a bovine ?-GPI from the medium used when testing AECA.46
DNA represents a planted or constitutively expressed antigen for AECA.47 A strong association was reported between AECA and anti-DNA antibodies in patients with SLE.3 Chan et al47 showed that this binding was partially caused by DNA?anti-DNA immune complex binding, and enhanced by histones. It was also shown that the binding of monoclonal anti-DNA antibodies to HUVEC was reduced by 20%, owing to treatment of HUVEC with deoxyribonuclease, suggesting presence of DNA on the endothelial cell surface.47 Finally, some AECA recognise antigens exclusively present in microvascular but not in macrovascular endothelial cells.48 Several phenotypic and functional differences are noticed between endothelial cell antigens from microvascular and macrovascular sites.49 Differences in their nutritional requirements and responses to growth and migration stimuli are also reported.50 In light of these findings, the use of endothelial cells from vessels of different sizes seems to be indicated during AECA assays.
Regarding scleroderma, two antigens were described?namely, a 95?100-kDa doublet and thrombomodulin.51 In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, a 44-kDa antigen was described, which was no more found with the disappearance of clinical vasculitis.52 In patients with Kawasaki disease, the antigens are not well characterised, but some cytokine-inducible epitopes may be important. AECA binding was detected by ELISA on both unstimulated and cytokine-treated endothelial cells.53 In patients with Wegener granulomatosis, protein bands of 25, 68, 125, 155 and 180 kDa were detected.54 It is not established whether proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase are also endothelial cell epitopes for AECA. Also, in patients with SLE, different groups reported antigens with molecular weights ranging from 15 to 200 kDa.3
Recently, IgG AECA from patients with SLE have shown a shared reactivity to a 60-kDa endothelial cell surface polypeptide, the human Hsp60, responsible for endothelial cell apoptosis.41 Much progress with respect to the identification of the target antigens for AECA has been brought about by new techniques (proteomics), one of which is the construction of expression libraries of complementary DNA to messenger RNA extracted from endothelial cells and transfected into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells; the obtained sequences are compared with those of the genes from the data bank.55
Molecular cloning strategy enabled the identification of a
novel
panel of candidate endothelial autoantigens in patients with
SLE. After detecting AECA by ELISA, western blotting was carried
out on samples from two patients and a HUVEC cDNA expression
library was screened with their sera for identifying the autoantigens.
Among them, the endothelial cell-specific plasminogen activator
inhibitor, ribosomal P protein P0, ribosomal protein L6, elongation
factor 1
, adenylcyclase-associated protein, DNA replication
licensing factor, profilin II, and human endothelial-associated
lupus autoantigens 1 and 255 were autoantigens. In one of the
two patients with SLE, antibodies to ribosomal P protein were
predominant. Furthermore, levels of these antibodies directly
correlated with AECA levels and clinical scores. Correlations between
specific antibodies recognising defined antigens with clinical
manifestations were described in patients with SLE.44,46,52,54,56
Another recent technique, two-dimensional electrophoresis, is
also promising. When combined with western blot analysis using
protein extracts from a hybridoma cell line, it enabled the
identification of antigens such as calreticulin, tubulin, vimentin
and Hsp70.57
ANIMAL MODELS
Animal models further
supported the pathogenic role of AECA. In 1988, Matsuda58
immunised guinea pigs with cultured endothelial cell membrane
products and found high AECA titres, resulting in proliferative
changes in the mesangial matrix and proteinuria. Injection of
antibodies to endothelial cell antigens, such as
angiotensin-converting enzyme or factor von Willebrand, promoted
experimental lung or renal injury.59
An idiotypic experimental model was created by Damianovitch.60
The active immunisation of BALB/c mice with AECA from a patient with
Wegener granulomatosis triggered the production of mouse AECA and
vasculitis, reflecting direct evidence for AECA pathogenicity.60
Finally, it is presumed that xenoantibodies or isoantibodies,
reactive with transplantation
antigens, may result in severe endothelial cell damage, as has
been suggested in experimental models.61,62
Allografts are carried out between members of the same species, and xenografts are carried out between members of different species; rejection is therefore usually expected after a short delay following the grafting (hyperacute rejection) via humoral mechanisms. Several data suggest that a mechanism of the graft damage is related to antibodies against the xenograft endothelium. It seems that AECA activate the classical complement pathway, which promotes endothelial cell activation and hyperacute rejection. In a pig-to-rhesus model, techniques for lowering the circulating AECA levels (plasma exchange) permitted a delayed rejection.62 However, recent data suggest that several other mechanisms are associated with hyperacute rejection, and that monitoring of the peripheral antibody responses is required in pig-to-primate xenograft recipients.63
AECA AND DISEASE ACTIVITY
A
fluctuation of AECA titres with disease activity was reported in
patients with systemic vasculitis.64,65 These data, however,
could not be confirmed by others.66 Although a temporal relationship
between AECA titres and disease relapses has not been shown,
AECA may represent a predictive marker for relapse for AECA-positive
patients, but ANCA-negative patients had an increased risk for
the clinical relapse.67,68 In patients with SLE, correlation
between AECA and disease activity suggests that AECA are markers of
disease activity, as was also shown for anti-DNA antibodies.69,70
AECA may be markers of disease severity as well. Therefore, high AECA
prevalence has been associated with vascular lesions, kidney
involvement, anticardiolipin antibodies, thrombosis71,72 and
pulmonary hypertension.73 Furthermore, correlations between
AECA recognising defined antigens with clinical manifestations were
reported.74
However, data from a study conducted on 48 patients are rather contradictory.75 Therefore, when evaluating different biological parameters to distinguish the quiescent and active phases of lupus nephritis, no correlation between AECA titres and disease was found. In SSc, AECA are more often found in patients with complications such as digital ischaemia, pulmonary hypertension76 and alveolocapillary dysfunction.77 AECA are closely correlated with pulmonary fibrosis78 and vasculitis,79 and AECA testing can identify subsets of patients with SSc with different prognoses.80 In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, AECA levels are higher in patients with renal or neurological complications.56,81 Vasculitis lesions are correlated with high AECA titres in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in those with Kawasaki disease.79
CONCLUSION
Several findings raise the
possibility that AECA might be pathogenic in connective tissue
disease and vasculitis. Moreover, some studies suggest that AECA may
be useful markers for disease activity. However, further study is
needed to clarify their clinicopathological significance.
FOOTNOTES
Published
Online First 28 March 2006
Competing interests: None declared.
REFERENCES