![]() |
|
Case Reports Indian Pediatrics 2003; 40:426-429 | |||||
|
Tachycardiac storm in infant with WPW syndrome: "Rescue" Radiofrequency Ablation | |||||
Kiran Chandan Yash Lokhandwala C.K. Ponde B.V. Dalvi*
Discussion RF ablation is rarely performed in infancy. The small diameter of femoral vessels imposes severe limitations on catheter choices. Apart from vascular complications, there are concerns of damage to the fragile intracardiac structures at such a tender age. We undertook RF ablation after all other measures had failed. The return of pre-excitation in our patient was unusual, because adenosine had demonstrated transient AV block after RF ablation. The intermittent nature of pre-excitation at follow-up is indicative of a long antegrade refractory period of the accessory pathway. The absence of tachycardia recurrence suggests that retrograde conduction over the pathway has been markedly diminished, if not eliminated by the RF ablation. There are apprehensions regarding increase in RF lesion size with growth based on studies in lambs(1). Hence RF ablation in infancy is undertaken only when severe tachycardia persists despite adequate trial of drug therapy. There are several reported series of RF ablation in children(2,3,4), but the proportion of infants in these studies have been very small. Our patient is the youngest reported hitherto from India. A previous report from India(5) highlighted a similar problem in a thirteen month old child. The mild mitral regurgitation noted in our patient has been well tolerated. It is possible that the RF lesion in some way has led to this regurgitation. However the absence of any visible damage to the leaflets or chordae is reassuring. The satisfactory clinical progress that we observed indicate a good prognosis in this regard. Contributors: BD conducted initial clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, CKP assisted in the RF ablation procedure, KC assisted in the management and help in writing the manuscript, YL helped in patient care and preparation of the manuscript and will act as guarantor of the paper. Funding: None. Competing Interests: None stated.
| |||||
|
References | |||||
|